User Avatar
Discussion

Do we say equipment is or are?

The choice between "is" and "are" when referring to "equipment" depends on whether the noun is being used in a singular or plural sense. However, "equipment" is typically an uncountable noun, meaning it does not have a plural form and is treated as singular. Therefore, the correct verb to use with "equipment" is "is."

Explanation:

  • Uncountable Nouns: These are nouns that cannot be counted and do not have a plural form. Examples include "information," "furniture," and "equipment." Since they are singular in nature, they take singular verbs.
  • Countable Nouns: These are nouns that can be counted and have both singular and plural forms. Examples include "book" (singular) and "books" (plural). Countable nouns take "is" when singular and "are" when plural.

Examples:

  1. Correct: "The equipment is ready for use."

    • Here, "equipment" is treated as a singular noun, so "is" is used.
  2. Incorrect: "The equipment are ready for use."

    • This is incorrect because "equipment" is uncountable and should not be treated as plural.

Exceptions:

In some rare cases, "equipment" might be used in a way that suggests multiple types or pieces of equipment, but even then, it is still treated as a singular noun. For example:

  • "The laboratory equipment is state-of-the-art."
    • Even if the laboratory has multiple pieces of equipment, "equipment" is still treated as singular.

Conclusion:

When in doubt, remember that "equipment" is an uncountable noun and should be paired with "is." This rule holds true in most contexts, ensuring that your grammar remains accurate and clear.

2.4K views 4 comments

Comments (45)

User Avatar
User Avatar
Taylor Alexander 2025-03-26 04:11:03

This article provides a clear and concise explanation about the usage of 'equipment' with singular or plural verbs. It's very helpful for non-native English speakers who often get confused with such grammar rules.

User Avatar
Wagener José 2025-03-26 04:11:03

I found the examples in this article quite useful. However, it would be even better if there were more real-life sentences to illustrate the point further.

User Avatar
Banerjee Malak 2025-03-26 04:11:03

The explanation is straightforward, but the article could benefit from a bit more depth. Maybe adding some historical context or additional grammar rules related to collective nouns would make it more comprehensive.

User Avatar
Thomas Đura 2025-03-26 04:11:03

Great read! The distinction between 'equipment is' and 'equipment are' is explained in a very simple and effective manner. Perfect for quick reference.